AI Coding Assistant ROI Calculator
Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code — is the productivity uplift worth the seat cost?
AI assistants are cheap per seat but the productivity claim is wide ranging (10–55% depending on whose study you read). Plug in your team and a realistic uplift to see the actual annual return.
Copilot Business ≈ $19, Cursor Pro $20, Claude Code seat varies.
70% of engineers actively use it
Value = engineers × adoption × fully-loaded cost × uplift. The seat cost is rounding noise at any reasonable uplift — the real cost is the measurement and onboarding effort, which most teams skip.
Runs entirely in your browser — nothing you enter is sent to a server.
Need this for real, on your stack?
These free tools are a taste of how we think. We’re a senior software team across Romania & Pakistan that ships deep technical work — platforms, infra, data and the gnarly bits in between.
Talk to our engineers →Where the uplift comes from
Real-world studies converge around 10–25% on routine tasks (boilerplate, tests, refactors). The "55% faster" headline numbers come from narrow tasks. Plan for the lower end and treat anything above as upside.
The gotcha
Uplift is not uniform — juniors gain more on routine work, seniors gain more on context switching. The break-even is almost always trivial at current seat prices; the real question is whether you measure it.
Built by WeWorkWorldwide — a senior software team in Romania & Pakistan that ships deep technical work. Need this turned into something production-grade for your stack? Talk to our engineers →